By John Couture-VideoETA
June 21, 2012
If there's one film in the last five years that surprised me more than any other, that would be Taken. I went into the film completely expecting to hate it and couldn't have been more wrong by the time the credits ended.
Had you told me before watching it that in the future, I would actually be anticipating its sequel, I would have called you mad. But yet, here I am and so too here is the first footage from Taken 2 by way of an international trailer.
I think the key behind the success of Taken was the simplicity of the story. Liam Neeson was driven by pure revenge to regain his daughter and the film was testosterone-driven crash course through some of the best action film clichés and some new ones that it created all on its own.
The CIA background on Neeson's character was shady at best and really did it matter? His daughter was kidnapped and he was going to kick all the ass that he could until he got her back.
So, the sequel could have gone two routes in my mind. It could have followed Neeson's character independent of his family as the events of the first film would have re-ignited some sort of buried desire to get back into the business. Or it could have concocted another forced scenario in which one of his family members is kidnapped.
Surprisingly, they decided to go with the latter and from the first look, I think it's safe to say they "chose wisely." The trailer sets up a vengeance tale from the father, or crime boss, of Liam Neeson's victims in the first film point of view. It also appears that Neeson and his wife get taken this time, although his daughter is still in the picture.
Taken 2 is one of those films that have flown under the radar this year and Fox hopes that its late Fall release will be enough distance between it and Liam Neeson's bomb Battleship. As it stands Taken 2 is set for October 5 release.
The trailer is below
___________________________________________________
 |
| A graphic I made. LOL |
__________________________________________________
Liam Neeson's 'Taken 2' Paycheck: $10 Million
 |
| Liam Neeson in "Taken 2" |
No sequel language and high-profile roles pushed the star's take north -- and may have priced him out of a possible "Taken 3."
Will there be a Taken 3? If so, producers of the smash-hit action franchise will need to pony up for star Liam Neeson in the wake of the surprise $49.5 million domestic bow by Taken 2.
No one expected a moneymaking franchise when the first Taken, about a retired CIA agent who unleashes all manner of hell to find his kidnapped daughter in France, was released in January 2009 after sitting on a shelf for nearly a year. That included filmmaker-producer Luc Besson's EuropaCorp, which produced the movie, French director Pierre Morel and Fox, which distributed the movie. After the film grossed $145 million domestically ($81.8 million internationally), Fox took a large ownership stake in the property and set about making a sequel. Besson and Robert Mark Kamen returned as writers (with Olivier Megaton replacing Morel), emphasizing the daughter role played by Maggie Grace and even bringing back Famke Janssen as Neeson's wife. The result: Taken 2's global haul reached $116.3 million by Oct. 7, and it will likely far outpace the original's global tally of $226.8 million.
But a third movie is not a slam dunk. To be sure, Fox and EuropaCorp would like another sequel, but the real question mark is Neeson. According to insiders, the CAA-repped actor was paid just $1 million for Taken, with no sequel language in the contract. After the movie hit big, Neeson suddenly found himself receiving leading-man offers. He upped his quote by starring in such action movies as The A-Team,Unknown and The Grey, so when it came time to negotiate for Taken 2, he was able to extract more than $10 million, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations.
Given the muscular box office of Taken 2, agency sources think Neeson could command $20 million-plus if he wanted to reprise the role -- a mark once considered standard for big franchise roles but now reserved for the likes of Johnny Depp and Will Smith in the right projects.
Fox insiders say it is too early to talk about the possibility of a third film. And both Neeson's interest and the timing are unclear. Nearly four years passed between Taken and Taken 2, and if that timetable were repeated, then Neeson, who turned 60 in June, would be close to retirement age in Taken 3 (though senior citizen status hasn't slowed the Expendables crew). Still, some insiders believe that if a sequel were to happen, it would have to shoot in 2013.
Commentary: I totally agree with that last sentence. Strike while the iron's hot and Liam isn't getting any younger.
No one expected a moneymaking franchise when the first Taken, about a retired CIA agent who unleashes all manner of hell to find his kidnapped daughter in France, was released in January 2009 after sitting on a shelf for nearly a year. That included filmmaker-producer Luc Besson's EuropaCorp, which produced the movie, French director Pierre Morel and Fox, which distributed the movie. After the film grossed $145 million domestically ($81.8 million internationally), Fox took a large ownership stake in the property and set about making a sequel. Besson and Robert Mark Kamen returned as writers (with Olivier Megaton replacing Morel), emphasizing the daughter role played by Maggie Grace and even bringing back Famke Janssen as Neeson's wife. The result: Taken 2's global haul reached $116.3 million by Oct. 7, and it will likely far outpace the original's global tally of $226.8 million.
But a third movie is not a slam dunk. To be sure, Fox and EuropaCorp would like another sequel, but the real question mark is Neeson. According to insiders, the CAA-repped actor was paid just $1 million for Taken, with no sequel language in the contract. After the movie hit big, Neeson suddenly found himself receiving leading-man offers. He upped his quote by starring in such action movies as The A-Team,Unknown and The Grey, so when it came time to negotiate for Taken 2, he was able to extract more than $10 million, according to a source with knowledge of the negotiations.
Given the muscular box office of Taken 2, agency sources think Neeson could command $20 million-plus if he wanted to reprise the role -- a mark once considered standard for big franchise roles but now reserved for the likes of Johnny Depp and Will Smith in the right projects.
Fox insiders say it is too early to talk about the possibility of a third film. And both Neeson's interest and the timing are unclear. Nearly four years passed between Taken and Taken 2, and if that timetable were repeated, then Neeson, who turned 60 in June, would be close to retirement age in Taken 3 (though senior citizen status hasn't slowed the Expendables crew). Still, some insiders believe that if a sequel were to happen, it would have to shoot in 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment